- pro-liberal-in-the-old-sense
- Liberalism in the old-fashioned 19th-century sense (as I understand
it) is based on an apprehension of the liberty (and, as a consequence,
responsibility) of the individual.
- pro-eco-taxes
- The green movement (in Germany, I don't really know how it manifests
in other countries) has the severe problem of gathering anti-capitalist
(cf. further down) and pro-socialist (ditto) viewpoints. IMHO, the
long-term survival of the ecosystem is of utmost importance, but can't be
guaranteed by mere laws and regulations. Instead, ecologically sound
behaviour must be made more attractive (i.e., cheaper)
than ecologicall unsound alternatives.
To quote Oscar Wilde on a related matter:
As long as war is regarded as wicked, it will always have its fascination.
When it is looked upon as vulgar, it will cease to be popular.
- pro-nuclear-power-generation-by-breeders
- It is my understanding that (electric) power generation is the most
basic prerequisite of any econonmy. Clean power generation must be
at the center of every ecologically sound economy. Diffuse and intermittent
power sources need large amounts of materials (solar panels, wind
generators) and backup systems (storage batteries, kinetic storage) to
work; centralized, high-gain, continuous power generation can be made much
more efficient, secure, and cheap. The amounts of nuclear waste generated
by a nuclear power cycle that uses breeder reactors and fuel reconstitution
are quite small; the main arguments against such a cycle are based on the
fear of plutonium and other potential-bomb-material being made
available. IMHO, that fear is unfounded; the danger of terrorists aquiring
one or more of the ca. thirty thousand ready-made bombs is much more
severe. Why would anyone be so dumb to try to build a bomb (not an easy
task even when the materials are at hand) when stealing one that is
guaranteed to work is so much easier?
- pro-bicycle, contra-internal-combustion-engine-powered personal
transportation
- While I have a license, I don't own or drive a car. There are a few
reasons for it; the least being the ecological factor, more important the
idiocy of owning a car in the center of Berlin, the biggest my fear
of accidents. To clarify: I don't fear to get injured or killed in an
accident - Andi once told me I
biked ``like a madman'' through Berlin's crowded inner city traffic,
totally oblivious of any dangers -, but I fear to injure or kill someone
else. When driving a 'cycle, the risk to harm other people is minimal; when
driving a car, the risk is substantial - one moment of carelessness
suffices. For some unfathomable reason, I don't value my own life very
high; but I have a great fear of harming others.
- pro-choice, contra-abortion
- Yup. Having to abort a fetus a usually a sign of bad planning in one
of the parents. Better to not create it in the first place. But when it is
necessary to abort, it should be easily possible.
- contra-prohibition
- Forbidding drugs of all kinds only sponsors organized crime (ex:
prohibition and the birth of the American Mafia), increases the
drug-related health risks (ex: methanol-induced blindness), and adds the
lure of the forbidden fruit.
- pro-capitalist
- IMHO, capitalism is the "freest" systems of regulating economic
behaviour that exists, besides being the "default" method of human trade.
Attempts to impose other systems are doomed to fail.
- pro-Peter-Singer
- Everyone should read the (german translation of a) collection of his
essays, "Praktische Ethik", especially the foreword that describes the
(what I would call) intellectual fascism still rampant in Germany. While
Singer might not be right in all his views, said points can be argued from
the axioms he uses, and those axioms are mostly sound. Most
anti-Singer-demagogues don't argue against his argumentations, but against
their consequences; this is IMHO idiotic.
- contra-socialist
- As in, contra-state-control, pro-minimalist-state. A state is usually
less efficient than its privately-owned free-enterprise counterparts. How
to avoid the creation of quasi-state-like monopolies and trusts is a
different problem, as is the enforcement of contracts, basic human rights,
and environemnt "taxes".
- contra-nationalist
- That one's obvious. The nation-state is a mindset of the last century,
it should be part of the trash heap of history.
- contra-racist
- That one's obvious, and should be a matter of course.
- contra-speciesist, pro-animal-rights
- Less obvious, but a necessary consequence of the preceding point. A
few days ago, I read an article on anti-speciesism (esp., on giving rights
to apes) that had a nice contra-argument to the "only humans can have
rights" position: since our legal systems are willing to grant rights to
beings that are not even alive (or have a physical presence), let
alone have any intelligent of their own (namely, companies and trusts),
there should be no problem in granting rights to beings that are obvioulsy
alive and somewhat intelligent!
Anti-quote (from the Britannica article on animal rights):
If St. Francis of Assisi was the greatest friend of animals, René
Descartes, the French philosopher, was perhaps their greatest enemy. He
believed that animals had no souls and that, as thinking and feeling
processes in his view were part of the soul, animals could feel no
pain. Further, Descartes concluded that animals were mere machines. He and
his followers marveled that these "mechanical robots," as they called them,
"could give such a realistic illusion of agony." Late in the 18th century,
the English jurist Jeremy Bentham phrased the matter differently: "The
question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they
suffer?"
- pro-ovo-lacto-vegetarian
- To me, the worst thing about killing animals is that it is so
unneccssary and inefficient (as a way to feed
humans). Human nourishment via vegetables, milk and eggs is easily
feasible. (Without the latter two, it it still possible, but you have to be
much more careful. Since one cow produces enough milk for two dozen people,
and a hen doesn't consume huge resources either, there is no real reason to
live without those two consumables.)
Oh, ere I forget: Tuna is not an animal. Whenever I staz at my mother's
house to for cat-sitting (i.e., with myself cooking), the cats get ecstatic
as they (try to) get their share from in my dinner, which surely contain
150g of tuna. (For some reason, my mother manages to prepare her fish
in ways that are unsuitable to catdom. I wonder why?)
- anti-emotional
-
I come from a family that, to borrow Scott Christensen's
phrase, is "composed almost entirely of the classic non-emotional
northern European stock". As a result, I loathe emotional outbreaks,
possibly because I can't cope with them very well. (As another result, my
chances at successful breeding aren't that high - not that I care.)
- pro-EU
- That one's an obvious consequence of being contra-nationalist. Some
kind of superstructure is necessary to guarantee a stable
political/economical environment. In Europe, that's the EU.
- pro-english/german/french-as-default-EU-languages /
contra-esperanto-as-a-EU-language
- Anyone out there who can't read and write one of {English, German,
French}? Why not?
Esperanto's grammar might be nice, but a language is 99% vocabulary, and
that is too unregular for me. Eurolang or
something else based on English vocabulary might have better chances.
- contra-political-correctness
- But that is, of course, part of the ordinary post-political correctness, no?
- pro-porn
- Any good reason why I shouldn't be?
- pro-Unitarian (contra-Paulian, pro-Islam)
- IMHO, Paulus was the first and most important of the "false teachers"
we were warned about. The whole idea of trinitarianism is ludicrous. Islam
nearly gets it right, but botches it by being too tightly
coupled with arabic customs. Reading Bukhari's collection of hadiths, one
can get an impression of what Islam might be; looking at the newspaper
shows how it has ended.
(No, I don't believe in a God, but if I did so, it would
a single, non-personal, law-giving one. Or maybe a Zen god, who only looks
for style of execution, not content ;-)
- contra-millenarianism
- People who believe that The End Is Near (TM) have no motivation to
hold value-conservative ideals (preservation of resources / variety of the
gene pool/ the environment) and are prone to irrational behaviour (witness
Jim Jones, David Koresh, or that recent Japanese sect). Talk of
self-fulfilling prophecies...
Any questions? Mail me.